How you conduct
You conduct like The Exacting Soloist: Delivery is your home turf, with 192 agents this window, with a verification streak underneath.
@priya-codes ✓ · Priya Raman
Plays alone, but no note leaves without passing the test.
Your blend
One score per tool
Your scores by harness
Each harness is scored only on what it can structurally observe (κ = observable capacity) and ranked against others on the same tool.
The fleet
192
AI agents conducted in the last 30 days
50
multi-agent workflows
1*
peak agents in parallel
33
work sessions
* Peak parallelism is a hardware ceiling — concurrency is capped by the machine's CPU cores, not by skill. The scale of the operation is the fleet total above.
Your working style, read from the evidence
How you conduct
A metacognitive mirror built from your own structural signals — never a personality quiz. deterministic
Your unfair advantage
Your edge is Delivery — your own signals show it (verification at 21%, a fleet of 192).
Your next frontier
The most exciting move ahead is Tooling: it's where you have the most open room, and a single new habit grows fast there.
Mastery zone
Delivery
Delivery is a strength (11.7/14): the signals back it.
→ 51 PRs this window → close the loop by opening a PR when each task lands.
Craft & Discipline
Craft is a strength (7.9/12): the signals back it.
→ 52 compactions → shorter, focused sessions cut noise and lift craft.
Competent
Orchestration
Orchestration (18.9/30) is solid, not your signature.
→ Peak now 1 concurrent agents → dispatch one more agent in the same verified workflow.
Verification
Verification (11.3/18) is solid, not your signature.
→ You verify 21% of edits → run a test/lint right after editing to reach 80%.
Most room to grow
Tooling
Tooling (0.0/16) is your blind spot — your biggest lever.
→ 0 MCP servers in play → connect one more to widen your tooling.
Autonomy
Autonomy (3.0/10) is your blind spot — your biggest lever.
→ Longest hands-off run: 10 steps → delegate a bigger block with automated verification.
What's holding you back
Tooling is where you have the most open room ahead (mcp_servers=0). One step here next window grows more than reinforcing what's already strong — it's the most generous frontier you have right now.
mcp_servers=0
Where you fit
Artisans · deep-focus IC
- end-to-end feature ownership
- gnarly single-thread bugs
Complements The Toolsmith, The Deliberate
Rubs against Parallel Maestro
Your next mission
Over the next 30d, raise mcp_servers from 0 to 2 and unlock the Toolsmith archetype.
The Toolsmith
Auditable, unlocked from your signals
Discoveries
Sub-archetype
The Shipper
Workflow-dense
Broad Verifier
Centurion
Workflow Pilot
Broad Verification
Shipper
Pillar breakdown
Each pillar score, with the evidence that sustains it.
-
Orchestration 18.9/30
192 agents dispatched across 50 workflows, peaking at 1 running at once.
-
Verification 11.3/18
21% of editing sessions verified, across 4 verification modes, with 15 human sign-offs.
-
Tooling 0.0/16
0 distinct tools in play, 0 advanced tool moves, 0 external systems via MCP.
-
Delivery 11.7/14
51 pull requests and 285 files changed, across 4 codebases.
-
Craft & Discipline 7.9/12
52 context compactions and 25 API errors over 33 sessions.
-
Autonomy 3.0/10
2 self-scheduled loops and a longest hands-off run of 10 agent steps.
Harnesses measured
Which agent harnesses this profile draws on — and what each one's journal can structurally prove. Disclosure only; it never changes the score.
| Harness | Orch | Verify | Tools | Ship | Craft | Auto |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | full | full | full | full | full | full |
A "partial" or "none" cell means the harness simply doesn't record that signal — the pillar is measured from what it does record, never penalised for what it can't.
Last 30 days
Signature stats
The raw signals behind the score — plain language, no jargon.
192
AI agents conducted
50
Multi-agent workflows
1
Peak agents in parallel
hardware-capped
51
Pull requests shipped
285
Files changed
21%
Edit sessions verified
10
Longest hands-off run
consecutive agent steps
19/30
Active days (of 30)
75%
Evenly spread work
4
Distinct codebases
0
External systems (MCP)
0
Distinct tools used
0
Advanced tool plays
15
Human sign-offs requested
Archetype
The Exacting Soloist
Base form: The Soloist
The Soloist is brilliant alone but delegates little — the raw skill is there; the fleet isn't yet.
How they work
Deep hands-on sessions with little delegation. The next unlock is orchestration: the same talent, multiplied by a fleet.
Ecosystem
Tool ecosystem
0
distinct tools
0
external systems (MCP)
0
advanced tool plays
Beyond the core toolkit, 0 external systems — mail, browser, calendar, cloud — are wired in via MCP and driven mid-workflow, alongside 0 distinct tools and 0 advanced tool plays like tool-search and skills.
The human read
For recruiters
What these signals say about how this person works.
Delegates at production scale
192 AI agents conducted through 50 workflows in 30 days. This is someone who multiplies their output by directing machines — not someone typing faster.
Ships with proof, not hope
21% of editing sessions end in verification, and 15 moments paused for explicit human sign-off. Work arrives checked.
Output, not activity
51 pull requests and 285 files changed across 4 codebases — the fleet lands as concrete, reviewable work.
Trusted autonomy
2 scheduled loops and a longest hands-off run of 10 agent steps — autonomy built on checks, not on faith.