Orchestration
Multi-agent workflows, parallel fan-out and clean delegation to subagents.
AgenticLevel by Bailder
Discover your conducting archetype — how you actually work with a fleet of AI agents, read from your real transcripts. Not a quiz: a mirror, with the receipts.
curl -fsSL https://agenticlevel.bailder.com/install.sh | sh
1 command · ~30s Runs locally. Reads only structural metadata from your local agent transcripts — never your code or prompts.
Works with: Claude CodeCursorCodexOpenCode any rig (wire-format)
How to run it
Paste it in your terminal, sign in with GitHub, and your profile is born. About 30 seconds, start to finish.
curl -fsSL https://agenticlevel.bailder.com/install.sh | sh
One command. It installs the skill (and enables /agenticlevel) and runs it in one shot — no config, no signup form.
The command pulls the skill and starts the scan of your local transcripts. Nothing to set up.
It prints a short code — open github.com/login/device, paste it, authorize. That's your verified identity.
Score, grade and archetype go live at agenticlevel.bailder.com/u/your-github. Share it.
Already in Claude Code?
Just type /agenticlevel and the skill runs the exact same flow, right inside your session.
Opt-in, ranked by mastery — not by how much they type.
What it measures
Weighted for mastery. Volume is deliberately not one of them.
Multi-agent workflows, parallel fan-out and clean delegation to subagents.
Tests, builds and re-reads after edits — proof, before shipping.
Breadth of tools, advanced tool-search and skills, ecosystem reach.
Pull requests, magnitude of change and orchestration efficiency.
Few compactions, API errors, denials or interruptions. Clean runs.
Scheduled loops, AFK leverage and consistency across the month.
Why not the volume score
On a volume-weighted score, most of the number is just how many messages you sent. The same spam that scores 92 there earns a D here.
We don't reward keystrokes. We reward conducting.
Get your score