How you conduct
You conduct like The Smith-Conductor: Verification is your home turf, with 1254 agents this window, with a tooling streak underneath.
@schmidt-k ✓ · Karsten Schmidt
leaning Rigor that won't just pass the test — it forges the bench that guarantees the green.
Your blend
One score per tool
Your scores by harness
Each harness is scored only on what it can structurally observe (κ = observable capacity) and ranked against others on the same tool.
The fleet
1,254
AI agents conducted in the last 30 days
88
multi-agent workflows
2*
peak agents in parallel
57
work sessions
* Peak parallelism is a hardware ceiling — concurrency is capped by the machine's CPU cores, not by skill. The scale of the operation is the fleet total above.
Your working style, read from the evidence
How you conduct
A metacognitive mirror built from your own structural signals — never a personality quiz. deterministic
Your unfair advantage
Your edge is Verification — your own signals show it (verification at 63%, a fleet of 1254).
Your next frontier
The most exciting move ahead is Autonomy: it's where you have the most open room, and a single new habit grows fast there.
Mastery zone
Orchestration
Orchestration is a strength (23.9/30): the signals back it.
→ Peak now 2 concurrent agents → dispatch one more agent in the same verified workflow.
Verification
Verification is a strength (14.9/18): the signals back it.
→ You verify 63% of edits → run a test/lint right after editing to reach 80%.
Competent
Tooling
Tooling (12.5/16) is solid, not your signature.
→ 6 MCP servers in play → connect one more to widen your tooling.
Craft & Discipline
Craft (9.4/12) is solid, not your signature.
→ 46 compactions → shorter, focused sessions cut noise and lift craft.
Most room to grow
Delivery
Delivery (10.2/14) is your blind spot — your biggest lever.
→ 26 PRs this window → close the loop by opening a PR when each task lands.
Autonomy
Autonomy (4.7/10) is your blind spot — your biggest lever.
→ Longest hands-off run: 12 steps → delegate a bigger block with automated verification.
What's holding you back
Autonomy is where you have the most open room ahead (afk_max_run=12). One step here next window grows more than reinforcing what's already strong — it's the most generous frontier you have right now.
afk_max_run=12
Where you fit
Orchestrators · quality-owning lead
- high-stakes correctness work
- refactors under risk
Complements Parallel Maestro, The Explorer
Rubs against The Autopilot
Your next mission
Over the next 30d, raise afk_max_run from 12 to 40 and unlock the Autopilot archetype.
The Autopilot
Auditable, unlocked from your signals
Discoveries
Sub-archetype
The Verifier
MCP Explorer
Heavy Fleet
Workflow-dense
Tool Scout
Centurion
Legion Commander
Workflow Pilot
Broad Verification
Connected
Toolsmith
Shipper
Self-scheduler
Pillar breakdown
Each pillar score, with the evidence that sustains it.
-
Orchestration 23.9/30
1,254 agents dispatched across 88 workflows, peaking at 2 running at once.
-
Verification 14.9/18
63% of editing sessions verified, across 4 verification modes, with 29 human sign-offs.
-
Tooling 12.5/16
21 distinct tools in play, 710 advanced tool moves, 6 external systems via MCP.
-
Delivery 10.2/14
26 pull requests and 256 files changed, across 4 codebases.
-
Craft & Discipline 9.4/12
46 context compactions and 34 API errors over 57 sessions.
-
Autonomy 4.7/10
6 self-scheduled loops and a longest hands-off run of 12 agent steps.
Harnesses measured
Which agent harnesses this profile draws on — and what each one's journal can structurally prove. Disclosure only; it never changes the score.
| Harness | Orch | Verify | Tools | Ship | Craft | Auto |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | full | full | full | full | full | full |
A "partial" or "none" cell means the harness simply doesn't record that signal — the pillar is measured from what it does record, never penalised for what it can't.
Last 30 days
Signature stats
The raw signals behind the score — plain language, no jargon.
1,254
AI agents conducted
88
Multi-agent workflows
2
Peak agents in parallel
hardware-capped
26
Pull requests shipped
256
Files changed
63%
Edit sessions verified
12
Longest hands-off run
consecutive agent steps
26/30
Active days (of 30)
79%
Evenly spread work
4
Distinct codebases
6
External systems (MCP)
21
Distinct tools used
710
Advanced tool plays
29
Human sign-offs requested
Archetype
The Smith-Conductor
Base form: The Deliberate
The Deliberate leads with craft and verification — nothing ships without proof.
How they work
Every change earns its place: tests, builds and re-reads follow the edits, and human sign-off gates the risky steps. Slow is smooth; smooth is fast.
Ecosystem
Tool ecosystem
21
distinct tools
6
external systems (MCP)
710
advanced tool plays
Beyond the core toolkit, 6 external systems — mail, browser, calendar, cloud — are wired in via MCP and driven mid-workflow, alongside 21 distinct tools and 710 advanced tool plays like tool-search and skills.
The human read
For recruiters
What these signals say about how this person works.
Delegates at production scale
1,254 AI agents conducted through 88 workflows in 30 days. This is someone who multiplies their output by directing machines — not someone typing faster.
Ships with proof, not hope
63% of editing sessions end in verification, and 29 moments paused for explicit human sign-off. Work arrives checked.
Output, not activity
26 pull requests and 256 files changed across 4 codebases — the fleet lands as concrete, reviewable work.
Trusted autonomy
6 scheduled loops and a longest hands-off run of 12 agent steps — autonomy built on checks, not on faith.