@jsmith-ops · Anonymous

Conducts many at once — and lets none pass without proving it's clean.

Your blend

One score per tool

Your scores by harness

Each harness is scored only on what it can structurally observe (κ = observable capacity) and ranked against others on the same tool.

The fleet

8,794 AI agents conducted in the last 30 days
796 multi-agent workflows
8* peak agents in parallel
55 work sessions

* Peak parallelism is a hardware ceiling — concurrency is capped by the machine's CPU cores, not by skill. The scale of the operation is the fleet total above.

Your working style, read from the evidence

How you conduct

A metacognitive mirror built from your own structural signals — never a personality quiz. deterministic

How you conduct

You conduct like The Tempered Conductor: Orchestration is your home turf, with 8794 agents this window, with a verification streak underneath.

Your unfair advantage

Your edge is Orchestration — your own signals show it (verification at 66%, a fleet of 8794).

Your next frontier

The most exciting move ahead is Autonomy: it's where you have the most open room, and a single new habit grows fast there.

Mastery zone

Orchestration Orchestration is a strength (27.8/30): the signals back it. → Peak now 8 concurrent agents → dispatch one more agent in the same verified workflow.
Verification Verification is a strength (15.0/18): the signals back it. → You verify 66% of edits → run a test/lint right after editing to reach 80%.

Competent

Delivery Delivery (9.6/14) is solid, not your signature. → 19 PRs this window → close the loop by opening a PR when each task lands.
Craft & Discipline Craft (8.9/12) is solid, not your signature. → 58 compactions → shorter, focused sessions cut noise and lift craft.

Most room to grow

Tooling Tooling (9.2/16) is your blind spot — your biggest lever. → 0 MCP servers in play → connect one more to widen your tooling.
Autonomy Autonomy (4.7/10) is your blind spot — your biggest lever. → Longest hands-off run: 12 steps → delegate a bigger block with automated verification.

What's holding you back

Autonomy is where you have the most open room ahead (afk_max_run=12). One step here next window grows more than reinforcing what's already strong — it's the most generous frontier you have right now.

afk_max_run=12

Where you fit

Orchestrators · fleet tech lead

  • large parallelizable migrations
  • multi-front delivery

Complements The Toolsmith, The Deliberate

Rubs against The Soloist

Your next mission

Over the next 30d, raise afk_max_run from 12 to 40 and unlock the Autopilot archetype.

The Autopilot

Auditable, unlocked from your signals

Discoveries

Sub-archetype Fleet Maestro
Heavy Fleet Workflow-dense Tool Scout Confident Delegator
Parallel Trio
Swarm
Centurion
Legion Commander
Workflow Pilot
Broad Verification
Toolsmith
Shipper
Self-scheduler

Next up: Safety Net reach verify_rate ≥ 0.8

Pillar breakdown

Each pillar score, with the evidence that sustains it.

  • Orchestration 27.8/30

    8,794 agents dispatched across 796 workflows, peaking at 8 running at once.

  • Verification 15.0/18

    66% of editing sessions verified, across 4 verification modes, with 25 human sign-offs.

  • Tooling 9.2/16

    15 distinct tools in play, 198 advanced tool moves, 0 external systems via MCP.

  • Delivery 9.6/14

    19 pull requests and 250 files changed, across 4 codebases.

  • Craft & Discipline 8.9/12

    58 context compactions and 33 API errors over 55 sessions.

  • Autonomy 4.7/10

    6 self-scheduled loops and a longest hands-off run of 12 agent steps.

Harnesses measured

Which agent harnesses this profile draws on — and what each one's journal can structurally prove. Disclosure only; it never changes the score.

Harness Orch Verify Tools Ship Craft Auto
Claude Code full full full full full full

A "partial" or "none" cell means the harness simply doesn't record that signal — the pillar is measured from what it does record, never penalised for what it can't.

Last 30 days

Signature stats

The raw signals behind the score — plain language, no jargon.

8,794 AI agents conducted
796 Multi-agent workflows
8 Peak agents in parallel hardware-capped
19 Pull requests shipped
250 Files changed
66% Edit sessions verified
12 Longest hands-off run consecutive agent steps
27/30 Active days (of 30)
70% Evenly spread work
4 Distinct codebases
0 External systems (MCP)
15 Distinct tools used
198 Advanced tool plays
25 Human sign-offs requested

Archetype

The Tempered Conductor

Base form: Parallel Maestro

The Parallel Maestro runs many agents at once and keeps them coherent — many hands, one baton.

How they work

Work is split into concurrent lanes: agents fan out in parallel, each with a clear mandate, and results converge into one deliverable. Coordination is the craft.

Ecosystem

Tool ecosystem

15 distinct tools
0 external systems (MCP)
198 advanced tool plays

Beyond the core toolkit, 0 external systems — mail, browser, calendar, cloud — are wired in via MCP and driven mid-workflow, alongside 15 distinct tools and 198 advanced tool plays like tool-search and skills.

The human read

For recruiters

What these signals say about how this person works.

Delegates at production scale

8,794 AI agents conducted through 796 workflows in 30 days. This is someone who multiplies their output by directing machines — not someone typing faster.

Ships with proof, not hope

66% of editing sessions end in verification, and 25 moments paused for explicit human sign-off. Work arrives checked.

Output, not activity

19 pull requests and 250 files changed across 4 codebases — the fleet lands as concrete, reviewable work.

Trusted autonomy

6 scheduled loops and a longest hands-off run of 12 agent steps — autonomy built on checks, not on faith.