@nuno-silva9 · Nuno Silva

Craft and verification lead. You ship only what you can trust.

Your blend

One score per tool

Your scores by harness

Each harness is scored only on what it can structurally observe (κ = observable capacity) and ranked against others on the same tool.

The fleet

100 AI agents conducted in the last 30 days
12 multi-agent workflows
1* peak agents in parallel
8 work sessions

* Peak parallelism is a hardware ceiling — concurrency is capped by the machine's CPU cores, not by skill. The scale of the operation is the fleet total above.

Your working style, read from the evidence

How you conduct

A metacognitive mirror built from your own structural signals — never a personality quiz. deterministic

How you conduct

You conduct like The Deliberate: Verification is your home turf, with 100 agents this window.

Your unfair advantage

Your edge is Verification — your own signals show it (verification at 50%, a fleet of 100).

Your next frontier

The most exciting move ahead is Tooling: it's where you have the most open room, and a single new habit grows fast there.

Mastery zone

Verification Verification is a strength (12.0/18): the signals back it. → You verify 50% of edits → run a test/lint right after editing to reach 80%.
Craft & Discipline Craft is a strength (6.4/12): the signals back it. → 14 compactions → shorter, focused sessions cut noise and lift craft.

Competent

Orchestration Orchestration (13.5/30) is solid, not your signature. → Peak now 1 concurrent agents → dispatch one more agent in the same verified workflow.
Delivery Delivery (3.5/14) is solid, not your signature. → 2 PRs this window → close the loop by opening a PR when each task lands.

Most room to grow

Tooling Tooling (0.0/16) is your blind spot — your biggest lever. → 0 MCP servers in play → connect one more to widen your tooling.
Autonomy Autonomy (0.9/10) is your blind spot — your biggest lever. → Longest hands-off run: 8 steps → delegate a bigger block with automated verification.

What's holding you back

Tooling is where you have the most open room ahead (mcp_servers=0). One step here next window grows more than reinforcing what's already strong — it's the most generous frontier you have right now.

mcp_servers=0

Where you fit

Orchestrators · quality-owning lead

  • high-stakes correctness work
  • refactors under risk

Complements Parallel Maestro, The Explorer

Rubs against The Autopilot

Your next mission

Over the next 30d, raise mcp_servers from 0 to 2 and unlock the Toolsmith archetype.

The Toolsmith

Auditable, unlocked from your signals

Discoveries

Sub-archetype The Verifier
Broad Verifier
Centurion
Workflow Pilot
Broad Verification

Next up: Safety Net reach verify_rate ≥ 0.8

Pillar breakdown

Each pillar score, with the evidence that sustains it.

  • Orchestration 13.5/30

    100 agents dispatched across 12 workflows, peaking at 1 running at once.

  • Verification 12.0/18

    50% of editing sessions verified, across 4 verification modes, with 3 human sign-offs.

  • Tooling 0.0/16

    0 distinct tools in play, 0 advanced tool moves, 0 external systems via MCP.

  • Delivery 3.5/14

    2 pull requests and 19 files changed, across 4 codebases.

  • Craft & Discipline 6.4/12

    14 context compactions and 9 API errors over 8 sessions.

  • Autonomy 0.9/10

    0 self-scheduled loops and a longest hands-off run of 8 agent steps.

Harnesses measured

Which agent harnesses this profile draws on — and what each one's journal can structurally prove. Disclosure only; it never changes the score.

Harness Orch Verify Tools Ship Craft Auto
Claude Code full full full full full full

A "partial" or "none" cell means the harness simply doesn't record that signal — the pillar is measured from what it does record, never penalised for what it can't.

Last 30 days

Signature stats

The raw signals behind the score — plain language, no jargon.

100 AI agents conducted
12 Multi-agent workflows
1 Peak agents in parallel hardware-capped
2 Pull requests shipped
19 Files changed
50% Edit sessions verified
8 Longest hands-off run consecutive agent steps
7/30 Active days (of 30)
85% Evenly spread work
4 Distinct codebases
0 External systems (MCP)
0 Distinct tools used
0 Advanced tool plays
3 Human sign-offs requested

Archetype

The Deliberate

The Deliberate leads with craft and verification — nothing ships without proof.

How they work

Every change earns its place: tests, builds and re-reads follow the edits, and human sign-off gates the risky steps. Slow is smooth; smooth is fast.

Ecosystem

Tool ecosystem

0 distinct tools
0 external systems (MCP)
0 advanced tool plays

Beyond the core toolkit, 0 external systems — mail, browser, calendar, cloud — are wired in via MCP and driven mid-workflow, alongside 0 distinct tools and 0 advanced tool plays like tool-search and skills.

The human read

For recruiters

What these signals say about how this person works.

Delegates at production scale

100 AI agents conducted through 12 workflows in 30 days. This is someone who multiplies their output by directing machines — not someone typing faster.

Ships with proof, not hope

50% of editing sessions end in verification, and 3 moments paused for explicit human sign-off. Work arrives checked.

Output, not activity

2 pull requests and 19 files changed across 4 codebases — the fleet lands as concrete, reviewable work.

Trusted autonomy

0 scheduled loops and a longest hands-off run of 8 agent steps — autonomy built on checks, not on faith.